Thursday, March 31, 2011

Jimmy Carter Bashes U.S. In Meeting With Communists

 

The exclusive dweller chair to publicly hold Middle Eastern coercion has completed a schmooze fest with a communist dictator in a land that appears on the U.S. State Department’s itemize of terrorist-sponsoring nations.

It marks the stylish “humanitarian” assignment for Jimmy Carter, who meet a whatever eld ago became the exclusive dweller commander-in-chief to participate in a hug fest with the nous of the world’s directive Middle Eastern terrorist group. During that highly-publicized Asiatic jaunt, Carter met with FTO Leader Khaled Meshal who runs his violent activeness from Damascus to refrain existence inactive by the Israeli government.

The worldly and well-funded Arabian extremist assemble has for eld appeared on the State Department’s itemize of external terrorist organizations and for a past president, or whatever western leader of Carter’s stature, to meet with its boss is inconceivable. Carter has daylong supported Arabian extremism and justifies its violence as a activity to Israeli apartheid. He modify wrote a aggregation ("Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid") most it in 2007.

This week the one-time Colony youngster creator prefabricated the rounds in Cuba, where he hung out with communist Dictator Fidel socialist and his brother Raul. Carter is the exclusive sitting or past dweller chair to visit the Caribbean island, also deemed a advocator of coercion by the U.S. government, since socialist took power in 1959. Carter also visited state in 2002.

The plan behindhand this week’s lowercase expedition was to handle ways to “improve U.S.-Cuba relations,” according to a press promulgation posted on the Carter Center’s website. The center prefabricated trusty to clarify that the activate is a “private, nongovernmental mission” and not whatever sort of official effort on the part of the Obama Administration. It will be engrossing to see if Carter meets with Obama to chat most the state task since both men poverty to displace decades-old sanctions against the land and amend a tighter relationship with the socialist brothers.

Not surprisingly, Carter took the possibleness to do whatever America-bashing during his meet on the island. He called on the U.S. polity to verify state off the itemize of countries that advocator terrorism, criticized America’s change embargo against the domineering communist despotism and insisted five blameable state polity spies be free from federal prison. The men, known as the state Five, were found blameable by a federal jury and have forfeited individual appeals despite existence represented by topnotch lawyers that most employed Americans could never afford. Never the less, Carter called for the prompt return “to their homes in Cuba.”

What can you expect from a guy who commends Middle Eastern terrorists and calls Zion the “tiny current around which swirl the winds of hatred, intolerance and bloodshed?” Israeli subjugation and persecution has driven resigned Palestinians to take slayer bombers as martyrs and consider the ending of Israelis as victories, according to Carter.

 


Tuesday, March 29, 2011

JW Files Two Lawsuits against Obama Department of Homeland Security for Records Detailing Alleged âStealth Amnestyâ Plan

Judicial Watch, the unstoppered interest assemble that investigates and prosecutes polity corruption, declared today that it has filed digit Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits against the Obama Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to obtain records detailing the Obama administration’s questionable organisation to present legal status to banned aliens without going finished Congress, a strategy commonly famous as “stealth amnesty.” Specifically, Judicial Watch is work an questionable organisation by the Obama brass to alter deportations of banned aliens who are in the country unlawfully (Judicial Watch v. US Department of Homeland Security (No. 11-604) and Judicial Watch v. US Department of Homeland Security (No. 11-606)).

On July 2, 2010, Judicial Watch dispatched a FOIA request to DHS hunt the mass information: “Any and every records of subject between the Department of Homeland Security and some of the mass entities, concerning ‘deferred action’ or ‘parole’ to alter removal transactions against a portion individualist or assemble of individuals for a specific timeframe; as well as records of subject concerning ‘selective reprieve’ to the portion of the population retentive terminated visas: The White House; The Executive Office of the President; Any third parties.” Judicial Watch sought internal DHS subject regarding “deferred state or parole” as well.

On August 30, 2010, Judicial Watch submitted a FOIA request to DHS hunt the mass information:

  • Any and every records of, and/or records concerning, Department of Homeland Security briefings regarding a systematised analyse of pending migration cases against suspected banned immigrants in Houston, Texas.
  • Any and every records of generalized guidelines issued to Department of Homeland Security attorneys, allowing liberation of pending migration cases.
  • Any and every records detailing the determination and feat of a systematised analyse of pending migration cases against suspected banned immigrants in Houston, Texas.
  • Any and every proportionality with non-governmental organizations…concerning the impact for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement to provide consideration of possible liberation of pending migration cases.

DHS recognized receipt of Judicial Watch’s FOIA requests. However, to date, the authority has unsuccessful to provide responsive documents. DHS has not indicated when a response module be forthcoming. In both cases, DHS has unsuccessful to move in the statutory allotted timeframe precipitating Judicial Watch’s lawsuits. (Reporting by The Associated Press suggests that DHS semipolitical appointees hit improperly suspended FOIA requests on politically sensitive topics.)

The Obama brass has been heavily criticized for their questionable organisation to bypass legislature and represent “stealth amnesty.” In June 2010, the advise bare a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service “draft” memo that distinct structure to present legalization to banned aliens without going finished Congress.

The August 24, 2010, edition of The metropolis Chronicle reported the polity had already locate digit much organisation into action: “The Department of Homeland Security is systematically reviewing thousands of pending migration cases and agitated to modify those filed against suspected banned immigrants who hit no serious criminal records…Culling the migration suite grouping dockets of noncriminals started in serious in metropolis about a period past and has stunned topical migration attorneys, who hit reported coming to suite anticipating clients’ deportations exclusive to learn that the polity was dismissing the cases.”

Despite grounds to the contrary, Obama claimed on Monday, March 28, 2011, that he does not hit a organisation in locate to alter deportations. “There are sufficiency laws on the books by legislature that are rattling clear in cost of how we hit to enforce our migration grouping that for me to simply, finished chief order, cut those congressional mandates would not conform with my pertinent role as president,” Obama said.

“President Obama may contain he has a organisation to alter deportations but the undergo of migration attorneys in metropolis suggests otherwise. That’s ground it’s grave that Homeland Security follows the unstoppered records FOIA accumulation and turns over these records. The American grouping requirement to know if the Obama brass has definite to discount our migration laws and represent stealth mercifulness for banned aliens who are unlawfully here in the United States. The stonewalling by the ‘transparent’ Obama brass suggests it has something to hide,” expressed Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton.


Friday, March 25, 2011

JW Lawsuit for Obamacare Anniversary

March 25, 2011

From the Desk of Judicial Watch President blackamoor Fitton:

Judicial Watch Sues Obama HHS for Records Related to Obamacare Propaganda Campaign

Wednesday was the prototypal day of Obama language the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, into law. Want to undergo how we famous Obamacare’s date at Judicial Watch?

We filed a lawsuit against the Obama Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to obtain records attendant to a taxpayer funded Obamacare propaganda campaign. And here’s ground this causa was necessary.

On Dec 15, 2010, Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) letter with HHS hunt the mass information: “All records concerning the creation and/or resource of advertisements on the Affordable Care Act.”

Two days later, on Dec 17, 2010, Judicial Watch conventional commendation from HHS that its letter was received. And then on January 14, 2011, we conventional additional commendation from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, a factor of HHS. So by law, a salutation to Judicial Watch’s FOIA letter was due no after than Feb 14, 2011. But the salutation from HHS has been predictable. We’ve conventional no documents, and HHS has unsuccessful to modify tell us when a salutation is forthcoming; hence our lawsuit.

It is important to note, this FOIA is by no means a shot in the dark. We already undergo the Obama brass has produced “misleading” advertisements using taxpayer dollars.

In Nov 2010, Judicial Watch separately obtained documents from the Obama HHS regarding a program of threesome Medicare broadcasting advertisements featuring person Andy Griffith. The Obama brass spent $3,184,000 in taxpayer assets to display and expose the advertisements on domestic broadcasting in Sept and Oct 2010 to â€" in the Obama administration’s words â€" civilize “Medicare beneficiaries, caregivers, and kinsfolk members most sociable changes to Medicare as a result of the Affordable Care Act.”

However, the aim of the ads was much more sinister, according to FactCheck.org, a beam of the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Public Policy Center:

Would the sheriff of Mayberry mislead you most Medicare? Alas, yes. In a newborn TV blot from the Obama administration, person Andy Griffith, famous for his 1960s acting of the crowning accumulation enforcement official in the fictional town of Mayberry, N.C., touts benefits of the newborn health tending law. filmmaker tells his fellow senior citizens, “like always, we’ll hit our guaranteed [Medicare] benefits.” But the actuality is that the newborn [Obamacare] accumulation is guaranteed to result in goodness cuts for digit collection of Medicare beneficiaries â€" those in clannish Medicare Advantage plans.

We undergo ground the Obama brass has had to make much a hornlike sell. The dweller grouping hit been opposed to Obama’s socialist takeover of our nation’s healthcare grouping from the beginning. And, with every of its essential troubles, it has modify inferior support today. So, the Obama brass definite to separate discover a beloved TV star to essay to make the shitting for them. We want to undergo what added they’ve been up to in their hyper-aggressive intend to obligate socialized penalization down our throats.

CORRUPTION CHRONICLES

Despite the prizewinning efforts of the Obama administration, Obamacare is in jural limbo. A federal judge in Florida has ruled Obamacare unconstitutional in a consolidated causa that participating 26 states hard the accumulation and today it is set for a show-down at the nation’s High Court. The main essential sticking saucer is the “individual mandate” to acquire health insurance, a factor of the accumulation the Obama brass has said is indispensable.

Here’s what Judge Vinson said on this saucer in his unofficial judgment:

It is arduous to envisage that a nation which began, at small in part, as the result of contestant to a nation dominion giving the East India Company a monopoly and dignified a nominal set on every tea sold in USA would hit set discover to create a polity with the noesis to obligate grouping to buy tea in the prototypal place. If legislature crapper penalise a passive individualist for imperfectness to vow in commerce, the enumeration of powers in the Constitution would hit been in vain for it would be “difficult to comprehend whatever regulating on federal power” [Lopez, supra, 514 U.S. at 564], and we would hit a Constitution in study only. Surely this is not what the Founding Fathers could hit intended.

As you know, Judicial Watch has taken the lead in actuation a comprehensive enquiry of Obamacare. We’re inquiring the Obamacare waivers (a itemize that has today soared past 1,000). We’ve bare info attendant to secret healthcare meetings between powerful unions and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, as well as others from the Obama administration. We’re inquiring whether or not the polity definite to locate a prostate cancer penalization Provenge low analyse solely based on its cost â€" an unprecedented and banned advise that caused whatever panic considering every of the speech most Obamacare modification panels.

A whatever weeks ago I told you we sued the Justice Department to obtain every records attendant to Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s participation in Obamacare discussions while she served as Solicitor General. We want to undergo if the housing should be prefabricated that Kagan should recuse herself when the accumulation finally reaches the Supreme Court.

The prototypal year of Obamacare has been scarred by lies, secrecy, and contempt for the conception of law. And today we hit our most recent causa over Obamacare taxpayer-funded propaganda. Especially today that the courts hit locate Obamacare in jural limbo, the terminal abstract the Obama brass should be doing is using taxpayer dollars to separate an Obamacare misinformation campaign. Stay tuned. We’ll let you undergo what we encounter out.

Extremist Hispanic Group Releases Racist Death Threat Video Attacking Negroid Civil Rights Activist

In every my 20 nonnegative eld in Washington, I’m not trusty I’ve seen anything as execrable as the video we obtained fresh from a immoderate Mexican advocator group.

The video, which was posted to the cyberspace and then afterward removed, brutally attacked black subject rights reformist Ted President with prejudiced smears and modification threats. The recording was free after Mr. President testified by invitation on March 15 before the Judiciary Committee of the Colony House of Delegates against providing taxpayer dollar for in-state teaching benefits for banned aliens. And it is vile.

The recording begins with the act “[expletive] you ‘Mayate,’” which is reportedly a prejudiced and uncomplimentary constituent utilised to smear individual Americans and “dark skinned” people. The recording then streams a program of prejudiced images including: The silhouette of a man ornamentation from a noose; photos of Mr. President conterminous to photos of monkeys and bananas; and doctored photos of Mr. President pictured with a gun incoming to his head. The video, which runs two transactions and figure seconds, concludes with the act “Your (sic) FREE Now Mayate go backwards to Africa.”

This hate recording was initially posted to the recording website YouTube by a assemble with the moniker “The Timmytop,” and was afterward removed. The Timmytop YouTube channel (now distant by YouTube for “multiple or nonindulgent violations” of the site’s Community Guidelines) included a number of immoderate propaganda videos with messages much as “This Is Our Land Whiteboy [expletive] you Gringo.” The videos seemed to impart support for the La Raza/Aztlan movement, which seeks to conquer the dweller Southwest and “return” it to Mexico. Notably, the videos attacked black and albescent Americans.

(Judicial Watch has investigated the Mexican reconquista shitting before. And if you don’t conceive this is a serious problem, our primary report most a Mexican advocator school in California module modify your mind.)

But Timmytop ransomed its most grievous neurolysin for Mr. Hayes. Mr. President is a long-time contestant of banned immigration, noting the fact that the devastating impact on the individual dweller accord is largely unnoticed by another black leaders. The Mexican reconquistas didn’t same what Mr. President had to say, so they set discover to quiet him with this recording attack.

Death threats and aggression of a attestator because of his evidence before the Colony legislature would break federal and Colony criminal statutes. For this reason, I hit titled on the Holder Justice Department and the Colony Attorney General to verify immediate state to investigate these threats.

In constituent to the criminal matter, I don’t conceive there is whatever uncertainty that the debate over in-state teaching for banned aliens in Colony has been compromised and chilled by these threats, which was apparently the aim here. It is our wish that the individuals answerable for this grievous recording module be held accountable to the conception of law. This is an move on the entire black community, not meet Ted Hayes.

By the way, Judicial Watch has obtained the recording in discourse and is making it available here. Be warned, it is abominably offensive. If it were a left reformist that was subjected to this prejudiced modification threat, you’d be hearing most it every over. I encourage you to intend the word discover most what happens to whatever colorful conservatives who defence up for the actuality and the conception of law.

Who is Running the Obama Justice Department?

Who is streaming the Obama Justice Department? That’s what we’d same to know. You haw letter a whatever months backwards we unconcealed the Department of Justice (DOJ) colluded with the immoderate left ACLU on its jural move against Arizona’s get-tough newborn banned migration law.

So perhaps it shouldn’t become as a assail that advise outlets hit suggested the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) haw be dictating subject rights policies exclusive DOJ â€" specifically DOJ’s selection on the infamous New Negroid Panther Party for Self Defense citizen aggression lawsuit.

A Washington Times inform noted that Kristen Clark, a allegoric of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, reportedly met with representatives from DOJ to discuss the causa meet preceding to DOJ’s selection to modify the case.

Now Clarke claims she didn’t hit anything to do with DOJ’s ultimate selection on the matter. But let’s let the dweller grouping be the judge of that.

On Nov 2, 2010, Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) letter hunt the mass information:

Any and every records of act between the Civil Rights Division and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Legal Defense Fund (including, but not restricted to subject with Kristen Clarke, Director of Political Participation) concerning, regarding or relating to U.S. v. New Negroid Panther Party for Self Defense, et al. (09-CV-0065). The time inclose for this letter is Nov 4, 2008 to May 22, 2009.

By law, DOJ was required to move to Judicial Watch’s FOIA letter by Dec 3, 2010. (But when has the Obama brass ever cared most FOIA law?) To date, no documents hit been produced. In fact, DOJ has unsuccessful to move to Judicial Watch’s letter at all! And so, on March 23, we filed a causa to obligate the Obama brass to respond.

The issue at the center of Judicial Watch’s causa is whether or not the NAACP improperly influenced the DOJ, an autarkical accumulation enforcement agency, to modify a causa against members of the New Negroid Panther Party who allegedly threatened and intimidated albescent voters right a polling station during the 2008 election. A DOJ official testified that the NAACP lobbied against using subject rights statutes to protect anyone who is not considered a traditional minority, a function that reportedly found souvenir exclusive DOJ.

According to the Oct 22, 2010, edition of The pedagogue Post: “Interviews and polity documents reviewed by The pedagogue Post exhibit that the [New Negroid Panther Party] housing broached into deep divisions within the Justice Department that preserve today over whether the authority should pore on protecting historically burdened minorities or oblige laws without regard to race.”

This conclusion is conformable with testimony from DOJ attorney, Christopher Coates, who testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which conducted a year-long enquiry of the New Negroid Panther Party scandal, that there exists at the DOJ “…a deep-seated contestant to the equal enforcement of the Voting Rights Act against interracial minorities and for the endorsement of whites who hit been discriminated against.” Coates had served as honcho of the DOJ Voting Rights country that brought the New Negroid Panthers Party lawsuit. He was unnatural discover of his function by the Obama ideologues at DOJ because, we believe, of his willingness to administer the accumulation disregarding of race.

Some exclusive DOJ apparently concord with the NAACP that our nation’s subject rights laws should only administer to destined races (and political groups), which is outrageous!

By artefact of review, DOJ filed its causa against the New Negroid Panther Party for Self Defense and threesome of its members mass an incident that took locate right of a metropolis polling station on Nov 4, 2008. A video of the incident, display a member of the New Negroid Panther Party brandishing a police-style baton weapon, was widely diffuse on the Internet. According to binary witnesses, members of the New Negroid Panthers blocked admittance to polling stations, vexed voters and hurled interracial epithets. Nonetheless, the DOJ finally overruled the recommendations of its own body and unemployed the majority of its charges.

Our latest FOIA causa is part of Judicial Watch’s comprehensive investigation of the New Negroid Panther Party scandal. Judicial Watch previously uncovered evidence crowning political appointees at Justice were intimately participating in the selection to modify the citizen aggression housing against the New Negroid Panthers Party. The documents direct contradict bound evidence by Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, who testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that no political activity was participating in the decision.

And today this.

Personally, I encounter it outrageous that left primary interest groups seem to be directing the activities of the nation’s crowning accumulation enforcement agency. The Obama DOJ has prefabricated a disorderliness of the New Negroid Panther Party lawsuit. We already undergo the DOJ’s selection to modify the housing was rotten by persuasion and racism.

Clearly, there is something haywire in the Holder DOJ.

For this reason, on Thursday, March 31, Judicial module patron a commission communicating at its Washington, DC, headquarters to discuss the New Negroid Panther Party proceedings and another scandals that hit plagued the Holder DOJ. The commission is entitled, “Politics and the Holder Justice Department: Rule of Law at Risk?”

We’ll beam you an telecommunicate incoming hebdomad with more info most how you crapper view the commission live on the cyberspace or see it in person.

Until incoming week…

Tom Fitton President Judicial Watch is a non-partisan, educational groundwork designed low Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code. Judicial Watch is dedicated to conflict polity and righteousness corruption and promoting a convey to ethics and morality in our nation’s open life. To make a tax-deductible contribution in support of our efforts, click here.

Twitter Judicial Watch on Twitter | Twitter blackamoor Fitton on Twitter | Facebook Judicial Watch on Facebook

YouTube Judicial Watch on YouTube | RSS Judicial Watch RSS


Thursday, March 24, 2011

JW Sues DOJ for Records Detailing Contacts with NAACP about Dismissal of New Black Panther Party Voter Intimidation Lawsuit

Judicial Watch, the open welfare assemble that investigates and prosecutes polity corruption, declared today that it filed a lawsuit on March 9, 2011, against the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) to obtain records detailing contacts between DOJ and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) over a citizen intimidation causa filed against the New Negroid Panther Party for Self Defense. Kristen Clark, a representative of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, reportedly met with representatives from DOJ to handle the causa meet prior to DOJ’s selection to modify the case.

On November 2, 2010, Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) letter hunt the mass information:

Any and all records of act between the Civil Rights Division and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Legal Defense Fund (including, but not limited to subject with Kristen Clarke, Director of Political Participation) concerning, regarding or relating to U.S. v. New Negroid Panther Party for Self Defense, et al. (09-CV-0065). The instance frame for this letter is November 4, 2008 to May 22, 2009.

By law, DOJ was required to move to Judicial Watch’s FOIA letter by Dec 3, 2010. However, to date, no documents hit been produced. In fact, DOJ has failed to move to Judicial Watch’s letter in any manner.

The supply at the edifice of Judicial Watch’s causa is whether or not the NAACP improperly influenced the DOJ, an independent accumulation enforcement agency, to modify a causa against members of the Negroid Panthers who allegedly threatened and intimidated albescent voters right a polling send during the 2008 election. A DOJ authorised testified that the NAACP lobbied against using civil rights statutes to protect anyone who is not thoughtful a tralatitious minority, a function that reportedly institute favor inside the Justice Department.

According to the October 22, 2010, edition of The pedagogue Post: “Interviews and polity documents reviewed by The pedagogue Post show that the [New Negroid Panther Party] housing broached into unfathomable divisions within the Justice Department that preserve today over whether the authority should pore on protecting historically oppressed minorities or oblige laws without regard to race.”

This conclusion is conformable with evidence by another DOJ attorney, Christopher Coates, who testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which conducted a year-long investigation of the New Negroid Panther Party scandal, that there exists at the DOJ “a deep-seated opposition to the equal enforcement of the Voting Rights Act against interracial minorities and for the endorsement of whites who hit been discriminated against.”

“Who is streaming the Justice Department? That is what we’re disagreeable to encounter out with this lawsuit. I encounter it outrageous that left special welfare groups seem to be leading the activities of the nation’s crowning accumulation enforcement agency,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama Justice Department has prefabricated a disorderliness of the Negroid Panther lawsuit. We already undergo the Justice Department’s selection to modify the housing was tainted by persuasion and racism. There is something amiss in the Holder Justice Department. And its unplanned violations of the freedom of information accumulation particular this administration’s dislike for transparency and the conception of law.”

The DOJ filed its causa against the New Negroid Panther Party for Self-Defense and threesome of its members mass an incident that took locate right of a metropolis polling send on November 4, 2008. A video of the incident, display a member of the New Negroid Panther Party brandishing a police-style baton weapon, was widely distributed on the Internet. According to multiple witnesses, members of the New Negroid Panther Party blocked admittance to polling stations, harassed voters and hurled interracial epithets. Nonetheless, DOJ ultimately overruled the recommendations of its possess body and unemployed the eld of its charges.

This stylish FOIA causa is conception of Judicial Watch’s comprehensive investigation of the New Negroid Panther Party scandal. Judicial Watch previously bare evidence that crowning political appointees at DOJ were nearly participating in the selection to modify the citizen intimidation housing against the New Negroid Panther Party. The documents directly contradict bound evidence by saint Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, who testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that no political activity was participating in the decision.

On Thursday, March 31, Judicial will patron a commission communicating at its Washington, DC, office to handle the New Negroid Panther Party litigation and other scandals that hit plagued the Holder Justice Department. The commission is titled, “Politics and the Holder Justice Department: Rule of Law at Risk?”


Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Senate Hearing To Protect Muslim Civil Rights

 

In “response to the fruit in anti-Muslim bigotry,” the U.S. senate Judiciary Committee has quietly regular a primary chance for primeval incoming hebdomad to better protect Islamic subject rights in America.

Organized by Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin, who chairs the establishment subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights, the circumstance module evaluation the first-ever congressional chance on Islamic subject rights. Durbin place it unitedly because he claims there’s been a inflate in anti-Muslim intolerance in the terminal year. As examples he offers Quran burnings, restrictions on masjid construction, hate crimes, hate speech, and other forms of discrimination.

Scheduled for March 29 in the Dirksen senate Office Building, the chance (“Protecting the Civil Rights of American Muslims”) module feature an all-star commission of left subject rights leaders, including the illegal immigrant exponent President Obama ordained to separate a key sectionalization of the Justice Department. Assistant Attorney General saint Perez, who heads the agency’s subject rights division, is the performer followed by Farhana Khera who runs a San Francisco group titled Islamic Advocates. Read about Perez’s latest shenanigans here.

In a speech at the Islamic Advocates annual dinner terminal year, Attorney General Eric Holder saluted the group and titled it a relation in his agency’s mission to promote tolerance, ensure open country and protect subject rights. Before the come Holder had met with Khera to handle “shared concerns” about ascension levels of churchlike intolerance and the unacceptable ”us versus them” attitude that the government has towards Muslims.

Those meetings were only conception of the Obama Administration’s current Islamic outreach efforts. In the terminal year lonely Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano discussed domestic security matters with a group of immoderate Islamic organizations, the nation’s expanse authority (NASA) was sequential to pore on Islamic diplomacy and Secretary of State mountaineer politico subscribed a primary order to earmark the reentry of two immoderate Islamic academics whose terrorist ties daylong illegal them from the U.S.

The Obama Administration also sent an America-bashing masjid leader (Feisal Abdul Rauf) who blames U.S. external contract for the 9/11 attacks on a Middle Eastern outreach mission and sequential a government-funded nutrition information for home-bound seniors to offer halal preparation embattled according to Islamic law.

 


Monday, March 21, 2011

$60 Mil To Study Climate Change Effects On Crops, Forests

With a domestic debt that tops $14 1E+12 and a large budget deficit, the U.S. polity is dishing discover $60 meg to think the personalty of status modify on crops and forests.

The multi million-dollar studies module pore on the impact that orbicular blistering module have in threesome key areas that polity officials verify could advance to matter shortages; gray conifer forests, cereal in the north and Midwestern corn. Because climatologists prognosticate orbicular blistering module transform cool, wet areas into dry and blistering ones there needs to be a variety of crops that crapper adapt to the changes, according to the federal authorised who’s handing discover the cash for the projects.

Otherwise, he assures that there module be shortages in certain kinds of foods. To refrain that possibleness crisis, the U.S. Department of Agriculture is gift threesome open universitiesâ€"in Florida, Chiwere and Idahoâ€"$20 meg apiece to help secure that farmers and foresters crapper ready producing matter and tone by minimizing the toll of a dynamical environment. The USDA is calling it a “major technological assets in studying the personalty of status modify on agriculture and land production.”

A academic of tree physiology at the University of Florida module nous the forestry study, which module pore on gray conifer and found a meshwork to monitor the personalty of status on “forest carbon sequestration.” A sociologist at Chiwere State University module advance the callus project which module appraise the impacts of various pasture direction practices under assorted “climate models” and an zoologist at the University of Idaho module monitor how cereal grows amid changes in grime carbon and gas levels.

Just last period a assemble of esteemed scientists from individual open universities warned that status modify module attain matter “dangerous” and consequently advance to the hungriness of jillions worldwide. That’s because orbicular blistering module make accumulated levels of matter dirtying from chemicals and “fungal pathogens” as substantially as diseases same cholera and shellfish poisoning. Some foods module become scarce, prices module process and subject unrest module ensue, according to the scientists who presented their housing at a pedagogue D.C. gathering.

Previous polity evaluations on the ills of orbicular blistering have determined that it module drive noetic sickness and cancer as substantially as domestic section threats by broad disease among people and animals. Check discover the government’s mental/illness cancer report and feature most the national section threats.

 


Friday, March 18, 2011

Obama Fails on Government Transparency

March 18, 2011

From the Desk of Judicial Watch President blackamoor Fitton:

JW Congressional Testimony: Obama Gets a “Failing Grade” on Transparency

“The dweller grouping were promised a newborn epoch of image with the Obama administration. Unfortunately, this promise has not been kept. To be clear: the Obama brass is inferior straight than the Dubya administration.”

That’s what I told the House and Senate this hebdomad in digit separate hearings held in union with “Sunshine Week,” a national initiative by the programme media, nonprofits and another organizations to promote polity image and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

The senate Committee on the Judiciary hearing, which took locate on Tuesday, was entitled “The Freedom of Information Act: Ensuring Transparency and Accountability in the Digital Age.” The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing, which took locate on Thursday, was entitled “The Freedom of Information Act: Crowd-Sourcing Government Oversight.”

It is a testament to Judicial Watch’s estimation and work, prefabricated doable finished the support of hundreds of thousands of Americans, that we were solicited to declare to both chambers of Congress.

The hearings went well, and we were aerated with attitude by both sides of the passageway (even Sen. Al Franken (D-MN)!). As I tweeted after the hearings, the programme was the nonpartisan support for polity image and the nonpartisan critique of Obama transparency.

Judicial Watch, as I spinous discover to both committees, is by farther the most active FOIA requestor and band in the nation. Overall, we’ve filed more than 325 FOIA requests with the Obama brass and filled 44 lawsuits against them in visit to oblige FOIA law.

I wish you’ll verify a instance to read my testimony as I ran finished a “greatest hits” of Obama brass stonewalling over the terminal digit years. But here are a whatever key excerpts:

  • Administratively, agencies shapely additional hurdling and stonewalled modify the most base FOIA requests. The Dubya brass was tough and tricky, but the Obama brass is tougher and trickier.
  • Since dweller taxpayers are on the hook for trillions of dollars, potentially including already $153 billion lonely for Fannie and Freddie, we deserve to know how and ground this business founder occurred and who in Washington, D.C., is responsible. Unfortunately the Obama brass disagrees. Last year, the agent Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the authority answerable for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, responded to our FOIA causa by informing us that every of the documents we essay are not subject to FOIA.
  • In the start of 2009, Judicial Watch body visited with senior White House official Norm Eisen, then-Special Counsel to the President for Ethics and Government, to discuss Judicial Watch’s motion of the White House traveller logs. The White House entertained us to publicly approval the Obama administration’s dedication to transparency, locution it would be beatific for them and beatific for us. However, the Obama team refused to desert their legally unjustifiable disceptation that Secret Service White House traveller logs are not subject to disclosure low FOIA law. So we filed a causa to communicate the suite to oblige the law.
  • …on field image issues, the Obama brass has embellish downbound on the lateral of secrecy. The Obama administration’s emotional “high continuance accumulation sets” from polity bureaucracies is meaningless in the grappling of key decisions to ready politically exploding touchable discover of the open domain. As farther as Judicial Watch is concerned, the Obama brass gets a failing evaluate on transparency.

A dedication to image staleness cut crossways partisan lines. Founding Father Evangelist President was keenly alive of the relationship between silence and corruption:

Liberty cannot be cured without a generalized noesis among the people, who hit a right, from the inclose of their nature, to knowledge, as their enthusiastic Creator, who does null in vain, has given them understandings, and a want to know; but likewise this, they hit a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, glorious correct to that most dreaded and envied category of knowledge; I mean, of the characters and conduct of their rulers.

My evidence came on the heels of a field Associated Press news this hebdomad that shows the Obama brass is actually decent inferior straight as instance goes on:

Two eld into its dedication to improve polity transparency, the Obama brass took land on less requests for federal records from citizens, journalists, companies and others terminal assemblage modify as significantly more grouping asked for information. The brass unconcealed at least whatever of what grouping desired at most the same rate as the preceding year.

People requested aggregation 544,360 times terminal assemblage low the U.S. Freedom of Information Act from the 35 maximal agencies, up nearly 41,000 more than the preceding year, according to an psychotherapy by The Associated Press of newborn federal data. But the polity responded to nearly 12,400 less requests.

CORRUPTION CHRONICLES

Truth fears no inquiry. If the Obama brass genuinely had null to hide, it would not go to such exceptional lengths to ready aggregation from the public. We were rattling entertained that the newborn assembly appears ready to verify the supply of image seriously. And we were honored to endeavor our conception in educating assembly and the dweller grouping most the Obama administration’s unprecedented dependency to secrecy.

It would not hurt for you to advert Senate Judiciary Chairman Pat Leahy (D-VT) and Ranking Member Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and House Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Ranking Member prophet Cummings (D-MD) for gathering the hearings and perception to your Judicial Watch.

The hearings are acquirable for check online. To analyse the senate hearing, utter here. To analyse the House hearing, utter here.

JW Goes to Court to Protect AZ Illegal Immigration Law

On Apr 1, Judicial Watch module represent the Arizona State Legislature in court, defending SB 1070, Arizona’s get-tough banned migration law, against the Obama administration’s all-out jural assault.

The Arizona Legislature has every correct to indorse its law, but the Obama brass is disagreeable to block it from connexion the lawsuit.

As noted by The Associated Press: “A federal determine ordered an Apr 1 chance for arguments over the Arizona Legislature’s request to embellish a band in the U.S. Justice Department’s contest to the state’s migration enforcement law. The Legislature argues that lawmakers should be allowed to support indorse the accumulation and advert a newborn accumulation that lets legislative leaders participate in efforts to indorse the enforcement accumulation against challenges.”

As I told you last month, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer subscribed “emergency legislation” on Feb 7, 2011, covering the artefact for the Arizona legislature’s intervention. And we filed a “Motion to Intervene” on Feb 11, 2011.

However, as noted in our recent response to the suite filed on March 7, the Obama brass is doing everything in its noesis to ready the Arizona Legislature discover of the causa by upbringing “a host of worthless objections:”

[The Obama administration] makes the patronizing suggestion that if the Legislature happens to hit “arguments that it wishes to advance, it should do so finished defendants” or only as an amicus. It is indisputable that the State of Arizona has today unequivocally indicated how it wishes to be sued in this case. It is not the proper persona of the United States to essay to dictate how Arizona presents its defense. Arizona is entitled to indorse itself in the behavior it sees fit. With the authorisation of this Court, it should be allowed to do so.

In recent installments of the Weekly Update, I’ve put the prominence on the Obama administration’s deep achievement on banned immigration. First, in a sound of arrogance the Obama brass decided to cut assembly and enact stealth amnesty by allowing banned aliens to roam liberated as daylong as they hit no “serious” malefactor record. (This policy speaks volumes as obviously the Obama White House does not conceive the rattling behave of violating federal migration laws is a “serious” act.)

At the same time, the Obama Justice Department (DOJ) also prefabricated the startling announcement that it module not prosecute shelter cities that roll discover the recognize matted for banned aliens crossover the border. These shelter policies are a candid violation of a federal migration enforcement accumulation passed in 1996. But ostensibly this is not a “serious” sufficiency accumulation for the Obama brass to enforce.

As I spinous discover terminal week, these sagging and unlawful policies may hit direct led to the death of a Colony buoy terminal season at the safekeeping of an banned outlander who had been arrested on digit prior occasions but was free onto the streets by the Obama administration. The buoy was just digit of some victims of banned outlander evildoing nationwide.

Add to this the DOJ’s decision to openly move the State of Arizona for only disagreeable to protect its citizens from the welt of rampant banned immigration, and you hit a recipe for disaster. That’s ground this causa is so important. We already represent Arizona State senate President Russell Pearce, who authored the legislation. And today we’re disagreeable to attain sure the Arizona assembly has its day in court. The suite and the dweller grouping requirement to know:

  • The Arizona Legislature has a correct to protect its citizens.
  • Arizona has a correct to consciousness accumulation low the Constitution, particularly when the federal polity fails to protect it.
  • The Arizona Legislature complied with every germane federal, land and topical laws, including the Arizona Constitution and the [U.S.] Constitution in crafting SB 1070.
  • SB 1070 is not preempted by federal accumulation or the Constitution. SB 1070 does not offend with federal law, does not represent an improper conception of immigration, and assembly has not full filled the field.

Folks, our client, State Senator Pearce, said it prizewinning when he deemed our efforts on his behalf a “legal effort of epic proportions.”

“It is outrageous that the Obama brass would move Arizona for only protecting its possess citizens, especially when it has unsuccessful so miserably to do its primary obligation and secure the border,” State Senator Pearce said. “As a Senator in a land on the frontlines, I wager firsthand the alteration existence done to our land and our country. What happens here in Arizona module impact every land in the land fascinated in protecting its citizens by enforcing the conception of law. We are a commonwealth of laws. We staleness hit the courage—the fortitude—to enforce, with mercy but without apology, those laws that protect the integrity of our borders and the rights of our straight citizens.”

The land is hunting to Arizona—and to your Judicial Watch—to attain sure our banned migration laws are enforced. We are chesty to defence with the citizens of Arizona in this fight to protect the Constitution and the conception of law.

JW Obtains Documents Detailing Terrorist Campaign to Recruit Juveniles and Attack Children

On March 11, a suspected terrorist slummy into the bag of an Asiatic kinsfolk and sworn an unspeakable act, business fivesome members of the family, including an infant, patch they slept.

Fox News Channel had the gruesome details:

Five members of an Asiatic kinsfolk were killed weekday night when a suspected terrorist slummy into their bag in the West Bank settlement of Itamar and stabbed them every to death. The 12-year-old daughter who returned bag from a friend’s concern unconcealed the bodies. According to police, the venture slummy into the concern armed with a wound and stabbed the mother, father and three children, older 11, 4 and a three-month-old baby. Two infants, older 2 and 4, survived the move patch escaping to their neighbors.

One paraprofessional on the environs noted, “The remove environs was shocking. Kids’ toys correct incoming to pools of blood.”

An official for Hamas, the Islamic terrorist group linked to the brutal attack, initially claimed that murdering person settlers was permitted by international accumulation before backtracking a day later, making the claim that “harming children is not conception of Hamas’s policy.”

But according to documents we fresh uncovered from the Defense Intelligence Agency, brutality against children is every conception of a organisation by Islamic terrorist groups to accomplish fear into their opponents. And not only are they targeting children with violence, but they’re also brainwashing another children to do their dirty work. (Overall, the records exist of digit Joint Task Force Intelligence Information Reports from debriefs of detainees at the U.S. detention artefact in metropolis Bay, Cuba.)

Through ingest of the Freedom of Information Act, Judicial Watch prefabricated the remarkable discovery, and then directly prefabricated headlines on Fox News Channel. (You crapper check communicator Catherine Herridge’s primary report here, lightness our work.) You crapper also read the documents for yourself. But here are a whatever of the highlights:

  • Extremist groups in Arabian Arabia and Yemen utilised belief as the main execution for recruiting juveniles. Extremist groups desirable juveniles who were slummy or involved in banned activities since they prefabricated cushy targets for recruitment.
  • Extremist groups are not hunting for a particular symptomatic in a recruit, but favour juveniles who are slummy or are involved in drinking and drugs. The juveniles are hunting for happiness and fulfillment in their lives, and they hit not institute it. For these reasons they are hypersensitive to existence brainwashed by immoderate groups.
  • No someone has resisted taking conception in an operation. Most juveniles are eager to participate after chance a churchlike speech given by digit of the trainers at the camp.
  • The Terrorist and Extremist Groups (TEGS) reassert their attacks on teen children (ages 5 finished 17) by claiming that the children are either non-believers or children of non-believers. The attacks on children are wilful actions.
  • The attacks on children are psychological dealings against non-believers to prevent them from organizing against the TEGS. The TEGS move schools and buses to maximize psychological effect. Attacks against children in schools and buses are utilised because they are cushy targets. The attacks are conducted to show non-believers how lowercase the TEGS conceive of non-believers lives who are against Islam.
  • The TEGS study attacks on children legitimate. The TEGS conceive the attacks on children are a churchlike beatific accomplishment and attackers module go to heaven. The TEGS encourage their members to start attacks on children.
  • Juvenile females are recruited into the immoderate groups, but not for operational purposes. The someone females embellish brides for immoderate members.

The records state that “approximately 40% of Al Qaida members in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq are imperturbable of juveniles low the geezerhood of 18.” Terrorists enlist juveniles at Koran study groups, football games, season camps, trips to another cities and tearful pools. Some extremists with connections to accumulation enforcement purposely direct and coerce possibleness someone recruits patch the youths are low collar and detained in jail.

(In Nov 2001, Suleiman Abu Ghaith, Senior Advisor to bin Laden and al-Qaida spokesman, said, “We hit not reached maternity with [America]. We hit the correct to blackball quaternary meg Americans, digit meg of them children and to exile twice as some and wound and cripple hundreds of thousands.” [Emphasis added])

These documents exposit al-Qaida’s grievous strategy: Target and enlist plastic juveniles to carry discover terrorist acts patch purposely inflicting hostility on children to accomplish fear in those who oppose them. We should be afraid that radical Islamists are using their belief to brainwash teen grouping to send terrorist acts and to reassert the remove of innocent children.

And it should not hit taken more than fivesome eld and digit presidential administrations to obligate the promulgation these documents. It is primary to verify the dweller grouping the actuality most the strategies and tactics of Islamic extremists.

Until incoming week…

Tom Fitton President Judicial Watch is a non-partisan, educational foundation organized low Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code. Judicial Watch is sacred to conflict polity and righteousness immorality and promoting a convey to motive and morality in our nation’s open life. To attain a tax-deductible effort in support of our efforts, click here.

Twitter Judicial Watch on Twitter | Twitter blackamoor Fitton on Twitter | Facebook Judicial Watch on Facebook

YouTube Judicial Watch on YouTube | RSS Judicial Watch RSS


Thursday, March 17, 2011

Judicial Watch Attorney Michael Bekesha to Testify at Public Hearing of the PA State Government Committee on Voter Fraud Bills

Judicial Watch attorney archangel Bekesha module wage evidence to this week’s university State Government Committee on Voter Fraud regarding digit pending bills, HB 934 and HB 647.

He will, on behalf of the polity watchdog Judicial Watch, focus on citizen humbug and how university is attempting to preclude it from occurring during forthcoming elections. According to Judicial Watch’s current investigation, ACORN and its various affiliates (most notably Project Vote) hit been involved in at small 35 well-documented election humbug schemes in 17 states.

At last count, roughly 27 states around the land are in the impact of expiration or hit meet enacted new laws to preclude citizen humbug in the future. As the Supreme Court (Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1, 4 (2006)) has stated:

Confidence in the state of our electoral processes is primary to the functioning of our participatory democracy. Voter humbug drives honest citizens out of the democratic impact and breeds discredit of our government. Voters who emotion their lawful votes module be outweighed by fraudulent ones module feel disenfranchised.

The digit pending bills seek to order voters to present picture finding before voting. The Supreme Court as substantially as other courts around the county hit held that much a responsibility is essential and an trenchant way to safeguard citizen certainty and protect the state of the electoral process.

  • When: Friday, March 18, 2011 12:45 PM ET

  • Where: Irvis Office Building Room G-50 Harrisburg, PA


Wednesday, March 16, 2011

County Faces Suit For Removing Muslimâs Scarf In Jail

 

In yet added housing of semipolitical quality removed amok, a federal appellate suite has ruled that a Islamic blackamoor convicted of goodness humbug can process a U.S. county for making her vanish her churchlike headscarf in a retentive cell.

The housing had previously been unemployed by digit removed federal courts in California, but the woman’s jural team at the dweller Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) kept appealing. This hebdomad the notoriously progressive and often reversed Ninth U.S Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 11-0 that the blackamoor (Souhair Khatib) can process southern California’s Orange County because her churchlike rights were desecrated when she was unnatural to verify off her hijab.

A three-judge panel from the aforementioned suite had previously agreed with a federal judge to modify the lawsuit, but the ACLU asked the flooded suite to try the case. In its new judgement the flooded Ninth Circuit says that a federal accumulation guaranteeing churchlike freedom to prisoners applies to a courthouse retentive radiophone where Khatib was sequential by deputies to vanish her headscarf for section reasons.

On a continual mission to appease Muslims, the Obama Administration joined Khatib in arguing that the law, enacted 2000, applies to conference cells same the digit at the Orange County courthouse. County officials counter that it covers only prisons that stop inmates for material periods and not transitional cells where malefactor suspects are kept for only a few hours.

But the Ninth Circuit says “congress witting to safeguard the permissible churchlike compliance of helpless persons incarcerated by the state" so the accumulation should be understood broadly. It boost points discover in its judgement that “a Islamic blackamoor who staleness materialize before strange men she doesn't know, with her hair and cervix uncovered in a violation of her churchlike beliefs, haw see dishonor and distress." This is precisely the sort of “mischief” the federal accumulation witting to remedy, the suite said.

Khatib and her economise pleaded blameable to goodness humbug in 2006 and the pair was twice detained for probation violations. On both occasions the Khatibs were sequential into a retentive radiophone for individual hours while they expected a suite hearing. In her causa against the county Khatib claims that she suffered a "deeply humiliating and defiling experience" when she was unnatural to vanish her headscarf for section reasons at the Orange County Superior Courthouse.

 


Monday, March 14, 2011

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton to Testify to Senate and House Committees on Obama Administration Transparency

Judicial Watch President blackamoor Fitton module provide evidence to this week’s senate and House hearings on polity deference to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). He will, on behalf of the polity watchdog Judicial Watch, focus on whether the Obama administration’s image promises are being kept. Judicial Watch has filed over 325 Freedom of Information requests with the Obama administration, and has been forced to file 44 lawsuits to obligate the Obama brass to comply with the Freedom of Information Act.

The senate Committee on the Judiciary chance is entitled “The Freedom of Information Act: Ensuring Transparency and Accountability in the Digital Age.” Senator Apostle carpenter Leahy (D-VT) is Chairman of the Committee, Senator physicist E. "Chuck" Grassley (R-IA) is the Ranking Minority Member. To analyse the senate Judiciary transactions weekday live online, click here: http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/

  • When: Tuesday, March 15, 2011

    10:15 AM ET

  • Where: Dirksen senate Office Building

    Room 226

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chance is entitled “The Freedom of Information Act: Crowd-Sourcing Government Oversight.” Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) is Chairman of the Committee, Congressman Elijah E. Cummings (D-MD) is the Ranking Minority Member. To analyse the House Government Reform and Oversight transactions weekday live online click here: http://oversight.house.gov/

  • When: Thursday, March 17, 2011

    9:30 AM ET

  • Where: Rayburn House Building

    Room 2154

The hearings are being held as part of Sunshine Week 2011 â€" March 13-19. Sunshine Week is a national start by the news media, nonprofits and another organizations interested in promoting polity transparency.